Implementation and Execution

Techcrunch’s Sarah Lacy asks if Execution is more important than Vision Napster changed the music world, but it was iTunes that profited off of it. Google was one of the last companies in the Internet bubble to try their hand at building a search engine—and was laughed out of some VCs’ offices as a result. … Continue reading “Implementation and Execution”

Techcrunch’s Sarah Lacy asks if Execution is more important than Vision

Napster changed the music world, but it was iTunes that profited off of it. Google was one of the last companies in the Internet bubble to try their hand at building a search engine—and was laughed out of some VCs’ offices as a result. Palm pioneered the smart phone, not Blackberry. And Friendster was the social network pioneer before Mark Zuckerberg even entered college.

I’ve always been of the opinion that execution or implementation matters much more than vision or ideas. As someone who has a lot of ideas, this is no small amount of pain to bear – the knowledge that I’m seldom going to be the person building the ideas I have.

Back more than a decade ago when I was writing, the whole point of writing was to get some of the ideas I had out of my head and into the world. It didn’t actually matter if anyone read them, it was cathartic to write, I got real enjoyment out of it. It took my ideas and gave them somewhere to live in the real world. With writing I could produce something – but when the idea was an image, I’d have to pay someone to draw it. It’s the same with code – though it’s a lot more expensive to get someone to write code than draw an image (As I have discovered).

But rather than sit on these ideas, I’ve done something about it. No-one could ever accuse me of being secretive with these ideas, with my vision of things – quite the opposite when I have lunch with folk and they tell me to be more secretive. I’ve even threw a few ideas into a melting pot with two separate groups of developers to see if any of them catch. Maybe some of them will create something cool and maybe, just maybe, they’ll remember me. What’s more important to me is that someone does these things, someone builds them.

Y’see, implementation, execution, is important. I’m always hearing of folk who won’t talk to developers or potential funders without the protection of an NDA without realising that they themselves are the main ingredient. I’m sure there will be others who reckon we should maintain the secrecy, maintain a barrier of protection especially when speaking to funders. After all – if you have but 2d and they have a hundred grand, who is better placed to put together a plan to implement the idea? But if my heart and soul are not part of the vision, then it’s not an idea I’ll lose sleep over.

CodingHorror goes iPhone 3GS

Jeff Atwood of CodingHorror writes about the iPhone I am largely ambivalent towards Apple, but it’s impossible to be ambivalent about the iPhone — and in particular, the latest and greatest iPhone 3GS. It is the Pentium to the 486 of the iPhone 3G. A landmark, genre-defining product, no longer a mere smartphone but an … Continue reading “CodingHorror goes iPhone 3GS”

Jeff Atwood of CodingHorror writes about the iPhone

I am largely ambivalent towards Apple, but it’s impossible to be ambivalent about the iPhone — and in particular, the latest and greatest iPhone 3GS. It is the Pentium to the 486 of the iPhone 3G. A landmark, genre-defining product, no longer a mere smartphone but an honest to God fully capable, no-compromises computer in the palm of your hand.

Here’s how far I am willing to go: I believe the iPhone will ultimately be judged a more important product than the original Apple Macintosh.

That’s pretty strong from someone who considers a Mac to be an expensive, beautifully designed hardware dongle…

Edu 2.0

Today I was lucky enough to attend the University of Ulster Computing and Mathematics Away Day – my role to represent Digital Circle and give the faculty staff an update on some of the exciting things we’re doing in mobile – starting with the iPhone initiative. One of the other talks was about Web 2.0, … Continue reading “Edu 2.0”

Today I was lucky enough to attend the University of Ulster Computing and Mathematics Away Day – my role to represent Digital Circle and give the faculty staff an update on some of the exciting things we’re doing in mobile – starting with the iPhone initiative.

One of the other talks was about Web 2.0, a suitably nebulous subject which was, for this talk, defined as “The Art of Listening, Learning and Sharing” which, up front, seems to be entirely suitable for a progressive university.

The issue for universities of the future is the fact that the average 11 year old has a higher “digital literacy” than the average lecturer in a university. This obviously colours what new students will expect from a university when they attend. They will likely expect interaction from their lecturer as a “peer” in some networks and yet not desire it in others. Few students may be happy with their Lecturers being a “Facebook friend” with the expectation that the difference in the culture hierarchy will mean it affects their relationship during classes. If a lecturer follows you on Twitter, he or she may see that you’re not impressed with the latest assignment and have decided to go out to Shine instead. That’s bound to be damaging.

Donald Clark mentioned formal higher education last week during his talks at the InvestNI IP Seminars. He referenced that you can download many lectures from eminent educators on YouTube, or from iTunes U. He claimed that classical classroom teaching is a horrid way to learn and that educators should be prepared to put their teaching material online. He also suggested that those who refuse to do so are perhaps insecure about the quality of their content?

This does not mean that lecturers are redundant as according to the talk today, students believe they are paying for face to face interaction with lecturers.

What does a “digital native” expect then?

When I went to university I had pretty much zero experience of computers. Sure – I had a Spectrum 10 years earlier but that wasn’t exactly inspiring. After my second year, we were presented with UNIX-based terminals in the Open Access Centres. This began my love of networked systems. I learned what I wanted (and learned more about that than what I was being taught). We had email but never interacted with university staff except to be told off for using the systems for accessing a MUD or MUSH which were the precursors of chat rooms to a degree (and arguably a precursor of Second Life). We had an instant messenger app called “zwrite” and we could use “talk” from the command line as well. And among our little cliques, we had the best fun.

These days, the new intake into the university will consist of people who have grown up with wikipedia, with chat rooms, with email, with instant messengers. They’re used to trusting the information sources they find online, they’re extremely competent at finding sources of information and sharing that information via social bookmarking or other online tools. They expect to have access to networks like Twitter or Facebook and are immediately suspicious or resentful of regimes which restrict that access. They’ll be able to circumvent those restrictions either through hacks distributed via their social network or by just using their phones (each individually more than a hundred times more capable than the computers I first used in the Open Access Centre). They’ll expect their assessment and course materials to be available online.

What’s more interesting is what access and interaction they expect from their lecturers. They’ll expect email. But what about blogs? Twitter? Facebook? SMS? Would they give their mobile number to their lecturer?

We didn’t have these problems…

Trans

Trans is an annual festival held (traditionally) in Belfast by the Waterfront and part of it is the Urban Arts Academy – heaps of courses across diverse subjects with professional trainers – and for not a lot of money. As part of the Academy this year you can learn FreeRunning, Radio Production, Game Design and … Continue reading “Trans”

Trans is an annual festival held (traditionally) in Belfast by the Waterfront and part of it is the Urban Arts Academy – heaps of courses across diverse subjects with professional trainers – and for not a lot of money. As part of the Academy this year you can learn FreeRunning, Radio Production, Game Design and iPhone Programming.

There are some courses which run throughout the festival, from the 6th – 24th July. This includes Photography, Graphic Design, Events Management, Radio Production and Journalism.

There’s also a heap of music related courses facilitated by Musicworks NI, Sonic Academy and BEAT Initiative. These are Rock Music, Music Production (Rock), Music Production (Electronic), DJing (Beginner), DJing (Intermediate) and Live Percussion.

The Design Courses series includes Comicbook Illustration, Aerosol Art, Game Design, Street Art, 3D Animation and Fashion Design.

And this year, they’re introducing Short Courses. This includes courses in Ableton Live, Alternate Reality Gaming, Home Recording with Garageband, Creating a Music Video, VJing, and Developing iPhone Apps.

Some of these courses are proving immensely popular so get your booking in quickly

Check out the full catalogue at http://transbelfast.com

iPhone 3GS Entitlementards

Let’s get something out of the way. I went out yesterday and bought an iPhone 3GS. It cost me my hard-earned cash and I’m selling my iPhone 3G to part fund this purchase. My wife has done the same. End of the day, we’re prepared to pay for the gadgets we want. Some people think … Continue reading “iPhone 3GS Entitlementards”

Let’s get something out of the way. I went out yesterday and bought an iPhone 3GS. It cost me my hard-earned cash and I’m selling my iPhone 3G to part fund this purchase. My wife has done the same. End of the day, we’re prepared to pay for the gadgets we want.

Some people think they’re entitled to anything they desire. I’ve whined about the entitlementard strategy here, here, here and here.

The latest dose of entitlementard comes at the launch of the iPhone 3GS.

It’s characterised by the #o2fail hashtag. But why are people incensed by it?

Y’see, back in October 2007, we bought out iPhones for over £250 and we were given an 18 month contract. In July of 2008, we were ‘allowed’ to break our contract and ‘upgrade’ to a subsidised iPhone 3G. It meant I spent £50-odd to get the 16 GB model and my other half upgraded for free to the 8 Gb model. It meant taking on a new contract but seeing as the iPhone was exclusive on O2, we weren’t going anywhere anyway. This iPhone was heavily subsidised, amortised across your 18 month contract, the same way that most smartphones are when you sign up to a contract and get a kick-ass phone. Nothing startling there.

The 3G was an upgrade on the original iPhone. It had a GPS, it had more storage, it had a better bluetooth chip. These things cost money. Actual, real money. Someone has to pay for that.

Roll on eleven months and the iPhone 3GS was released. Brand new chip which was 2-3 times faster than the previous model with a modest increase in clock speed, a new 3D chip, a magnetometer, more storage, a better battery and other tweaks.

Immediately a heap of folk on the ‘net expected that O2 would immediately allow ‘loyal’ iPhone 3G customers who still had 7 months or more on their contract to magically upgrade to the new iPhone. O2 offered two options. Upgrade early by:

  • using your O2 priority status (if you pay more than £80 a month, you can upgrade 6 months early and pay off the ‘extra month’. The rationale being that you’ve put a lot more cash through O2 than the average punter and they want to reward you for that – you’re much more likely to have paid off the subsidy after all.
  • buying out the remainder of your contract. Probably a minimum of £35 x 7 months as an up-front cost plus then the cost of a new contract and new phone.

and the only other option was buying a PAYG iPhone 3GS at full price and swapping SIMs. In any other situation, dealing with any other population of users, these options would be fair enough.

The explosion of anger from the so-called loyalists was nothing sort of laughable. The poor sap behind the O2 Twitter presence has to be a saint. These guys wanted free upgrades. They’ve screamed, they’ve shouted. They’ve called names, threatened to leave O2. They wanted to be able to walk out of their subsidised contracts and not have to pay up. These are not the actions and behaviour of ‘loyal’ customers. And let’s be honest – with 110% mobile phone saturation out there, the addition or subtraction of a couple of thousand subscribers is worth precisely nothing to the big carriers.

Some remain adamant that O2 will be forced to change their minds. Some are very angry that OS are not folding to their vocal public opinion and that unless you are an iPhone user with an O2 contract, you cannot fully understand the complexity of the argument with O2. Hm, now that’s not really true. This is just a case of gadget-lust, a case of some folk feeling entitled to something that they have no right being entitled to.

Now, those who did upgrade anyway are apparently “elitist/herd”.

Now, think about this. Anyone who is using the #o2fail hashtag on Twitter wants an iPhone 3GS. They want a free iPhone 3GS. Heck, I want a free iPhone 3GS. But I am willing to pay for what I want and I’m not really the sort of person to whine about it for lengthy periods of time. Remember – it’s two weeks ago that the iPhone 3GS was launched. It’s two weeks we’ve known about the pricing – and some people are still whining about it. But there’s a certain kind of hypocrisy calling people “herd” for actually deciding to go and buy it using their hard-earned cash.

That’s the Entitlementard hypocrisy.

Make it more…

We’ve been joined on teh Internets by a new service, TweetNI, by the incredibly prolific Lee Munroe. If you don’t know Lee, make an effort to make his acquaintance. He’s smart, savvy and has a great eye for design. He’s previously partly responsible for The Big Word Project, Lookaly and probably other things I’m not … Continue reading “Make it more…”

We’ve been joined on teh Internets by a new service, TweetNI, by the incredibly prolific Lee Munroe.

If you don’t know Lee, make an effort to make his acquaintance. He’s smart, savvy and has a great eye for design. He’s previously partly responsible for The Big Word Project, Lookaly and probably other things I’m not even aware of. TweetNI represents his latest foundling.

To join TweetNI you just need to tweet something with the tag #tweetni. This joins other redundant tags which localise content and services and there seems to be no limit to how many tags there are. Essentially it’s a list on the Internet.

Here’s my problem with it.

What’s the next step?

You get a heap of people on a list. The people who rise to the top are already the popular people so they’re going to gain followers. If you’ll notice, these folk also don’t follow many people (but they do retweet a lot of web site links).

What could the site be used for? How about an authoratative skills matrix and extend/replace the Bio? How about building an event scheduling service – where anyone who joins can post something and have decent feeds coming out of it? How about a Trust engine? An opt-in personal recommendation engine? How about a list of Twitterers who would be interested in car-pooling? Or listing folk by region who would be interested in beer-garden tweetups on a Sunday?

All I’m saying is that a list by itself is spam. A list which can introduce some social change or commentary, some potential collaboration or just even an opportunity to extend a hand in friendship to someone.

Ping from San Francisco

I’ve been in San Francisco since Saturday, facilitating a group of 30-odd engineers from home who are attending the Mac, iPhone and IT tracks here at Apple’s World Wide Developer Conference (WWDC). They’re also lapping up the sessions in WebKit development and learning the latest and greatest WebKit tools and techniques – so much so … Continue reading “Ping from San Francisco”

I’ve been in San Francisco since Saturday, facilitating a group of 30-odd engineers from home who are attending the Mac, iPhone and IT tracks here at Apple’s World Wide Developer Conference (WWDC). They’re also lapping up the sessions in WebKit development and learning the latest and greatest WebKit tools and techniques – so much so that the Web deserves it’s own track.

I’ve not managed to get into many sessions – but that’s okay – because I’ve been working on what is important for delivery of this strategy. Talking to Venture Capitalists and Business Angels, talking to international companies who are interested in taking advantage of our top-class developers and long history of technical excellence and trying to find some deal flow out of it all.

I’ll not be blogging properly until after I get back so you’ll have to be patient. I’m back this coming weekend and I’m not jetlagged as much as I was at the start of this trip (waking at 4 am now).

I miss home though. Am thinking of my family pretty constantly.

Channel 4 surveys Digital Natives.

Channel 4 just published some results of a survey into how “young people” interact with the telly, with the web, games and each other. They personally own 8 devices (including MP3 player, PC, TV, DVD player, mobile phone, stereo, games console, and digital camera) They frequently conduct over 5 activities whilst watching TV 25% of … Continue reading “Channel 4 surveys Digital Natives.”

Channel 4 just published some results of a survey into how “young people” interact with the telly, with the web, games and each other.

  • They personally own 8 devices (including MP3 player, PC, TV, DVD player, mobile phone, stereo, games console, and digital camera)
  • They frequently conduct over 5 activities whilst watching TV
  • 25% of them agree that “I’d rather stay at home than go on a holiday with no internet or phone access”
  • A quarter of young people interviewed text or IM (instant message) friends they are physically with at the time
  • They have on average 123 friends on their social network spaces
  • And the first thing the majority of them do when they get home is turn on their PC

Above all, youth’s obsession with technology is around communication.

What they took out of this was:

The TV is still young people’s most popular way to consume media, though in terms of time spent, TV time is pipped to the post by spending time on the internet.

I’m only really bothered by the words “consume media”. I rarely watch TV programmes linearly and spend a lot more time “consuming media” using my phone or notebook computer. In addition – using blogs, tools like twitter, I’m involved in the creation of that media – be they debates, micro-conversations or social plans.

I’d be interested in seeing what percentage of ‘old fogeys’ like myself would agree with the bullet points listed above. Do you watch TV with your laptop and mobile? Ever sent a message via text or Twitter to someone sitting in the same room? (I’ll excuse husbands and wives texting each other in interminable visits to relatives with the sentiments “Can we go yet?”)

So, what about you? Are you a digital native or a digital immigrant, new to these shores?

Haggling: a way to kill a startup

This one did the rounds before I finally paused for two minutes to see it. This sort of abusive relationship endeared me to one of the big names in the content industry in Northern Ireland. It was 2003 and I was working in a brand new startup. Out cashflow was zilch and I had five … Continue reading “Haggling: a way to kill a startup”

This one did the rounds before I finally paused for two minutes to see it.

This sort of abusive relationship endeared me to one of the big names in the content industry in Northern Ireland. It was 2003 and I was working in a brand new startup. Out cashflow was zilch and I had five families to look after.

“If you give me three of these $high_end_powermacs now, then I’ll pay for them in three months.”

Needless to say he was shown the door and I’ve never worked with that company since. Caveat Startup.

Was I too “risk averse” at the time? Did I want to risk the little savings I had (which were paying salaries at the time) in order to try and weather out three months of no cash flow for someone who drove a big car and owned a big building? Maybe I made the wrong decision but it’s my feeling that if I’d taken that step then the following five years of work, fighting and the joy of success would have been condensed into three months of going out of business (and the machines would therefore never be paid for).