Nokia open sourcing Symbian?

[From SMSTextNews] I didn’t see this one coming Espoo, Finland – Nokia today announced it has launched a cash offer to acquire all of the shares of Symbian Limited that Nokia does not already own, at a price of EUR 3.647 per share. The net cash outlay from Nokia to purchase the approximately 52% of … Continue reading “Nokia open sourcing Symbian?”

[From SMSTextNews]

I didn’t see this one coming

Espoo, Finland – Nokia today announced it has launched a cash offer to acquire all of the shares of Symbian Limited that Nokia does not already own, at a price of EUR 3.647 per share. The net cash outlay from Nokia to purchase the approximately 52% of Symbian Limited shares it does not already own will be approximately EUR 264 million

or this

London, UK – Nokia, Sony Ericsson, Motorola and NTT DOCOMO announced today their intent to unite Symbian OS(TM), S60, UIQ and MOAP(S) to create one open mobile software platform. Together with AT&T, LG Electronics, Samsung Electronics, STMicroelectronics, Texas Instruments and Vodafone they plan to establish the Symbian Foundation to extend the appeal of this unified software platform.

Contributions from Foundation members through open collaboration will be integrated to further enhance the platform. The Foundation will make selected components available as open source at launch. It will then work to establish the most complete mobile software offering available in open source. This will be made available over the next two years and is intended to be released under Eclipse Public License (EPL) 1.0.

This tells me two things.

  1. The providers are rattled by Apple’s iPhone and they want to have more control over the OS they run on their phones. Symbian has, for a long time, been derided as an also-ran in the embedded operating system market and damaged by the friction between licensees and their fracturing of the code base and interfaces.
  2. The providers are not convinced by Google’s Android. Android handsets were meant to be shipping in the second half of 2008 and we’re seeing maybe one or two providers that seem to be getting there. We’ve seen very little other than technology demos and it’s my gut feeling that there was a large amount of overpromise and underdeliver. As Android still doesn’t look as polished as iPhone did 6 months before introduction, we’re going to have to wait even longer.

Is making Symbian open source going to be enough? Over the last year, Apple has sold 6 million iPhones and a couple of million touch iPods. And they’re probably going to double that number over the summer. Nokia ships that many phones in a week. It’s a small percentage of the overall mobile market but like in the computer and MP3 player market, Apple is not going for the bargain basement £25 Pay-As-You-Go market but rather the market for premium phones.

It’s estimated that 1 billion phones will ship in 2008 and around 10% of them (100 million) will be smartphones. For Q4 2007, Symbian had 65% of the Smartphone market measured by operating system. Windows mobile was 12%, RIM 11 % and Apple a mere 7% (which, from nothing, is impressive). It’s expected that these figures will differ slightly by year end.

It was easy to make an analogy with the general computing market. Symbian was the big presence in the market, Apple was Apple as usual and the upstart Google was going to be the ‘Linux’ of the story. The lines, however, have been redrawn and Symbian being open source should benefit considerably from the media attention.

The mobile phone operating system war just got really interesting.

0 thoughts on “Nokia open sourcing Symbian?”

  1. It won’t save Nokia.

    I’ll say it again: Nokia has been on top not because they’re excellent. Their competitors have beeb crap.

    That’s changed.

    Nokia won’t succeed. Maemo failed. This too.

  2. I think there’s a few years left in Symbian simply due to market momentum – probably enough for them to wait until Android is usable.

    Maemo was a disappointment. The OS2008 release is buggy, slow and has very little software compared to the late OS2007 release. Never mind the dearth of compatible hardware. Very disappointing.

    Using my Nokia N800 really makes me appreciate how good the iPod touch and iPhone are.

  3. The remaining Nokia momentum is the swirl of the death spiral.

    >>>Using my Nokia N800 really makes me appreciate how good the iPod touch and iPhone are.

    There it is in a nutshell. All that time they had and what did they produce? The same old crap we’ve seen before. No real talent. No imagination. Nokia thinks they can graft that thinking into the company via acquisitions. Nope.

  4. According to RoughlyDrafted, people simply don’t WANT to develop for Symbian – but, you know, it’s a job.

    http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/07/apples-iphone-vs-smartphone-software-makers/

    If Symbian were a great development environment, Nokia wouldn’t have needed to buy Trolltech, and could have used Symbian to power its line of Linux-based Internet Tablets such as the N800. As Nokia moves away from Symbian, the partnership is set to fall apart.

    Consumers will decide. My other half says she is NOT upgrading to a 3G iPhone because she doesn’t want to be tied in for 18 months (which seems like crazy talk to me). She is a big fan of Nokia. Her big complaint is that her phone was sluggish.

    And Android. Agh. I hate not knowing what’s going on and so far I’m utterly uninspired by screenshots. Their UI so far is to Linux as Symbian is to Windows.

Leave a Reply