Television

BusinessInsider writes about the imminent demise of TV business models This user behavior has been changing for a while, and, so far, it has had almost no impact on the TV business. On the contrary, the networks and cable companies are still fat and happy, and they’re coining more and more money every year. But … Continue reading “Television”

BusinessInsider writes about the imminent demise of TV business models

This user behavior has been changing for a while, and, so far, it has had almost no impact on the TV business. On the contrary, the networks and cable companies are still fat and happy, and they’re coining more and more money every year.
But remember what happened in the newspaper business.
When the Internet arrived, user behavior started to change. It took a decade for this change in behavior to hit the business. But when it hit the business, it hit it hard–and it destroyed it shockingly quickly.
And the same thing seems likely to happen to the TV business.

Really good article especially when you look at the UK and more specifically the microcosm of Northern Ireland.

We have two ‘local’ broadcasters. The BBC and UTV. One of them is propped up by advertising sales via their profitable radio station segments. And the other is propped up by a mandatory tax levied if you own a television or computer.

On top of this we have Channel 4 and Channel 5 and then a multitude of Freeview channels.

I just wonder what will happen in the current market. Well advertising supported television die off as advertisers become more savvy to changing user habits? It seems to me that advertising supported channels (UTV, C4, C5) are making hay while the sun shines. Of the three only Channel 4 seems to have made any efforts towards changing models for the future.

And then we have the BBC. It will obviously break the mould for television business models due to the government subsidy from the ‘license fee tax’. Indeed, it seems well suited to weathering an upcoming storm though it has many faults. Not least the insistence that the intellectual property that it has within the archives is extremely valuable. I don’t deny these things have value but decades of poorly considered contracts and a lack of future-proofing have made their position untenable. We, the television-owning public in the UK, paid for all of this content once already. I can’t help but feel we’re being nickel’n’dimed now we want to view older content.

The shakedown of television is just beginning. And it will start with local channels and move to the larger national and international advertising supported channels.

The Co-Viewing Experience

About a year ago I was fortunate enough to meet with Ewan McIntosh while he was Digital Commissioner for Channel 4’s 4IP project. We waxed in the workshop about how many of us commonly pay attention to three screens at once – when we’re watching TV; we have our laptops and mobile phones beside us. … Continue reading “The Co-Viewing Experience”

About a year ago I was fortunate enough to meet with Ewan McIntosh while he was Digital Commissioner for Channel 4’s 4IP project. We waxed in the workshop about how many of us commonly pay attention to three screens at once – when we’re watching TV; we have our laptops and mobile phones beside us.

4IP’s remit was daring for the time. The core message I got was “no TV”. This wasn’t about audiences, it was about interactive, it might work alongside something that was TV and it might result in TV, but it wasn’t about TV.

Today I see this (emphasis mine):

Magazines and newspapers aren’t the only media eying big benefits upon the iPad’s arrival: TV is poised to use the device in new ways, including creating interactive, social apps designed to be used while watching live programming.

MTV Networks, for example, is developing a “co-browsing app meant to be used while watching live TV,” said one executive familiar with MTV’s iPad plans. “This means the iPad could be the appendage that makes interactive TV a reality.”

“Fifty-nine percent of people are multitasking when watching TV — that’s something we’ve always known,” said Ms. Frank, referring to recent Nielsen data quantifying a longstanding observation. “This is the next evolution.”

Of course it is.

When I watch TV, I have my laptop open. I’m looking up things, referencing actors, events, checking for the locations mentioned. (Frankly, it’s a little bit tiring.) But most importantly this is content that could be sold or advertised upon – it could be monetised by the television station, provided by the content producer on a platform that offers the content alongside the regular programming.

For example, while I’m watching Wonders of the Solar System with the very smart and cheerful Professor Brian Cox. I’m chatting to friends about the content, I’m following the good Professor on Twitter and I’m thinking about stuff such as:

Screen shot 2010-03-30 at 17.14.34

which ended up being answered by the Professor himself. Insanely cool.

TV shows are set to a timetable, we know ahead of time when they stop or start.And there’s more possibility for peripheral web sites to offer content which is synchronised with broadcast. This idea isn’t terribly new – Nico (who now works at UTV) wrote about it on his blog:

Whatever the future of TV, it is clear that online and social media are going to play an increasing part in how and where we consume broadcast media. Being part of a shared media experience, even if you are on your own, will be the shape of things to come.

There’s an opportunity for local television companies to build a much bigger proposition, to actually deliver on the “360” that is buzzword in television commissioning. It should be about the ‘web site’, it’s about the co-viewing experience.