AppStore Wars starting to heat up…

Today the Ovi App Store goes live. (at the time I’m writing this, the web site is down – was up earlier, but is down now…) More than 50 Nokia devices are compatible with the service from day one, with stacks more slated to roll out over time – Nokia estimates that around 50 million … Continue reading “AppStore Wars starting to heat up…”

Today the Ovi App Store goes live. (at the time I’m writing this, the web site is down – was up earlier, but is down now…)

More than 50 Nokia devices are compatible with the service from day one, with stacks more slated to roll out over time – Nokia estimates that around 50 million people with Nokia devices will be able to benefit from Ovi Store right now.

Considering there’s around 35 million iTunes App Store-compatible devices out there, that’s not a terribly bold statement. I’m vaguely annoyed that OVI doesn’t work with my Nokia N800 (due to the Maemo platform) but that’s not the end of the world.

App Stores are pretty big in the news. It was only last week that Microsoft backtracked on their ‘sharing apps’ statement so there’s no “Welcome to the Social” in the Windows Mobile Skymarket and their plans to use the Live ID as the method of tracking installations on up to 5 mobile devices. This puts it on a par with Apple’s iTunes App Store terms – up to five devices – though on an iPhone, you can ‘loan’ someone an app by temporarily logging into your iTunes account on their iPhone.

I’ve now witnessed the Ovi Store, the iTunes AppStore and RIM’s AppWorld first hand and frankly I’m not impressed with the competition.

Tarmo Virki, of ITnews.com.au reckons there will be few victors in the ‘me too’ race to have an App Store for mobiles.

“There are too many people investing too much money into something they do not understand,” said John Strand, chief executive of Strand Consult. “They are all using the me-too strategy, not focusing on consumers – these guys don’t read numbers, they read media.”

“They are all desperately following but they are chasing it with all their own legacy issues,” Frank Meehan, chief executive of INQ Mobile, the maker of Facebook- and Skype phones, said at the Reuters Global Technology summit in Paris. “An App Store will get a customer to buy your phone only if it’s better than Apple’s,”

It’s going to be a big battle between equipment makers and operators,” said Alex Bloom, chief executive of mobile software distributor Handango. “It’s an interesting battle as carriers are equipment makers’ biggest customers.”

France Telecom Chief Financial Officer Gervais Pellissier said operators have an advantage in the race as they control the customer billing process and can make the application purchase procedure much smoother for customers.

Frankly I reckon there’s going to be a battlefield littered with corpses and adoption of these other stores is going to be an uphill battle. Apple has 40 000 apps in their AppStore – all of which work on the 35 million iPhones and iPod touch devices out there. RIM has around 1000 in AppWorld and OVI claims 666 items for the Nokia 5800 XpressMusic and 1007 for the Nokia N95 8GB and nothing at all for the Nokia E65. Even looking at OVI on the web, you can see the icon and price and general rating for an app, but there’s no screenshots and certainly no video. Folk have criticised the iTunes App Store for not having a demo mode or hosting videos of the interaction – but OVI hasn’t learned from this.

The problem here is the lack of unified approach, lack of vision and far too much consideration of ‘me too’ and getting something out there and I think the Palm Pre, though enticing and very pretty, will suffer the same. Apps on the Pre are web-apps and it will, I predict, be harder to get people to pay for these apps especially when you’re limited to the sort of apps that a web app can manage.

“In a desktop app is I can add 100% of the web. But the web can only add like 10% of the desktop.” – Daniel Jalkut, Twitterer and Mac Dev

and this also goes for Mobile. Would you have been able to create Crash Bandicoot on the Pre? Or the Blackberry? Or play it on the disastrously specced Nokia N96?

The AppStore Wars are just beginning but there are some clear winners and losers from the outset.

So why develop for the iPhone

Nick commented on my earlier post claiming that the cost of a development machine (a Mac) is simply too much to sway him to develop for the iPhone. This mentality ignores the principle that good apps on the iPhone MAKE money. CONNECTED DATA writes about why they develop for the iPhone: When the pitcher releases … Continue reading “So why develop for the iPhone”

Nick commented on my earlier post claiming that the cost of a development machine (a Mac) is simply too much to sway him to develop for the iPhone. This mentality ignores the principle that good apps on the iPhone MAKE money.

CONNECTED DATA writes about why they develop for the iPhone:

When the pitcher releases the ball a batter has to decide where they will swing. If they wait too long the ball will be in the catcher’s mitt before they decide. The same logic is why we are developing for the iPhone.

In learning about development for the Blackberry platforms, we have to create a build for each phone and each network. As a developer, I just can’t afford it. Most of my customers right now have Blackberries. I think that in the next year or two they will have an iPhone.

Thing is, this problem already exists for Symbian devices and it will become an issue for Android devices as well. (It’s less of an issue for Windows Mobile because the UI is so generic ,and meaning that in the negative sense, that it doesn’t matter. It would be on a refrigerator and still be crap!)

David Pogue’s recent and damning review of the new BlackBerry Storm has the internet all a-twitter about the shortcomings of the device.

He writes:

“A light touch highlights the key but doesn’t type anything. Only by clicking fully do you produce a typed letter. It’s way, way too much work, like using a manual typewriter.”
“Remember: To convert seconds into BlackBerry time, multiply by seven.”
“Freezes, abrupt reboots, nonresponsive controls, cosmetic glitches. Way too much ‘unexpected behavior.”

Why do developers prefer the iPhone?

Developers aren’t a tricky breed. They like to code cool applications and get paid for it. The benefit of coding for the iPhone/iPod Touch is that the specs are the same and aren’t likely to change anytime soon. Coding across platforms takes more time, energy and money, and if the payoff isn’t there, then developers aren’t likely to adjust their code for the varying screensizes and hardware/software features specific to a particular phone.

Mark my words – it’s simple to develop for Android now that there’s a single hardware specification (in the form of the T-Mobile G1). It’ll be entirely different when there’s five competing hardware manufacturers.

Moving on…

The Office iPhone

Rob from SMSTextNews writes about the iPhone: I used to work for an agency that believed that Macs were better at everything. It would spend a fortune on a Mac and then only use it to do MS Word, Excel, PowerPoint and the interweb. It did seem like a waste of money, especially as the … Continue reading “The Office iPhone”

Rob from SMSTextNews writes about the iPhone:

I used to work for an agency that believed that Macs were better at everything. It would spend a fortune on a Mac and then only use it to do MS Word, Excel, PowerPoint and the interweb. It did seem like a waste of money, especially as the company in question wasn’t the best payer out there.

Oh man, when you read this, you know that the article is going to be more fluff than content. Obviously you don’t need a Mac if you’re just using email, a web browser and office productivity applications. I mean why would you want a Mac – aren’t they just the same thing?

No, Rob, they’re not. Even if all I did was use Word and Powerpoint and Excel and Interweb, I’d still want to be doing it on a Mac. Inability to fathom the difference this would make just means that the rest of your post can be easily categorised into “He just doesn’t get it”.

You see, apparently the iPhone is now being adopted by more companies as an all-purpose communications device.

I’m not that surprised that it’s being adopted. Having tried both I think I’d still rather have the CrackBerry 8120 especially as it has WiFi on it. It’s not pretending to be something else.
I have an iPod (two in fact) and so never listen to music on the phone. I have a camera. I have a phone. I don’t really check the web on my phone because it’s rarely that urgent. So, that leaves me with the need for email and, quite simply, Blackberry is perfect for this. Especially as it has keys to easily type one.

Having used both BlackBerry and iPhone within the last two years, I see little evidence to suggest that having keys makes it easier to type. In fact, the presence of keys just seemed to eat up real estate on the device. For someone who wants to carry two iPods, one camera and a phone and who has no need to web browse on the phone, a BlackBerry might make some sense. For me, the availability of my media, the ease of use of email and the web, the flexibility of the App Store, the sheer screen real estate and even the fact it has a camera, albeit a poor one, make the iPhone the convergence device for me. I don’t carry other devices out and about (and when I do, it’s the full gamut of 17″ laptop, solar chargers, maybe even the N800).

I guess “He just doesn’t get it”.

BlackBerry forsees problems in next quarter?

Shares in RIM, the BlackBerry firm, fell nearly 8% after they announced earnings of $482 million, up from $223 million from the year-ago period on revenue of $2.24 billion. However this is not news. Look at RIMM over the course of a full year and you see the trend is unmistakeably upward (much like AAPL … Continue reading “BlackBerry forsees problems in next quarter?”

Shares in RIM, the BlackBerry firm, fell nearly 8% after they announced earnings of $482 million, up from $223 million from the year-ago period on revenue of $2.24 billion. However this is not news. Look at RIMM over the course of a full year and you see the trend is unmistakeably upward (much like AAPL if you ignore that big drop in February/March.) So you have to ask – if their profits doubled then what’s the problem.

The problem is the next three months.

RIMM expect revenue to increase slightly over last quarter but they expect profit to be down (by around 1%). We’re still talking about margins in excess of 50% here but the most telling part, for me, is near the end of the Earnings Call transcript.

Jeffery Kvaal – Lehman Brothers
…to what extent are there other variables about pricing that we should be considering? Are you worried about overlap with the Apple customer base as well?
James L. Balsillie
I think the second half of your question doesn’t have particular relevance to our thinking…
Jeffery Kvaal – Lehman Brothers
Okay, so thanks. That sounds like you aren’t seeing too much of an overlap then, Jim, with the iPhone customer base in particular.
James L. Balsillie
No.

I don’t think they believe him.

BlackBerry has some stiff competition ahead when both the iPhone 3G shipa (in two weeks) and the Android phones begin to ship (speculating year-end). They’ll still do well because they already have a huge installed base and large corporations are not simply going to swap everything over based on these releases. But one of the hardest things on your laurels is resting on them.

I’m not a fan of the BlackBerry and this is based on having to support BlackBerry users when I was in Mac-Sys. I didn’t find the device a pleasure to use and that makes such a difference to me – and I think the realisation that computers don’t have to be awful is being realised by others as well.

The thing that made BlackBerry so compelling in the late 90s is being eroded by modern phones. Even the crappy Nokia I had for a loan phone had email and not enough people see the virtue in a push email system for it to be compelling by itself. And, as Apple and Microsoft have shown, push email is not something exclusive to BlackBerry.

Should RIMM be worried about AAPL?

Yes.

On April 2nd this year, RIMM announced the number of BlackBerry subscribers had passed 14 million – the BlackBerry has been on sale since 1997. To put this in perspective, Apple sold 6 million iPhones in far fewer countries in less than a year and they’re about to sell more than 10 million more.

In the Earnings transcript, James L. Balsillie said:

…once you decide to become a BlackBerry user, you kind of stay there for life.

Considering the 14 million, that’s kinda disappointing.