Android release today. TIME fairy tales.

Proving that TIME Magazine subscribes to the same dose of “stupid and misinformed” that so many other online publications have a direct tap into, Anita Hamilton exposes her ignorance with regards to the iPhone and Google’s Android offerings in a hilariously titled piece “Google’s Dream, Apple’s Nightmare?” – a play on the news that the … Continue reading “Android release today. TIME fairy tales.”

Proving that TIME Magazine subscribes to the same dose of “stupid and misinformed” that so many other online publications have a direct tap into, Anita Hamilton exposes her ignorance with regards to the iPhone and Google’s Android offerings in a hilariously titled piece “Google’s Dream, Apple’s Nightmare?” – a play on the news that the first phone offering Android as an operating system is going to be the HTC Dream.

The sweetest part of the Dream is the Android Market — Google’s answer to the Apple App Store. Whereas many Apple apps cost money (typically anywhere from $0.99 to $9.99), at launch all Android Market apps will be free.

Sorry, Anita, but that’s completely wrong. The Market will be a “market” – there will be some apps that are free but some that will cost money. It’s not about free as in price, but freedom as in the ability to put any app you want on there – which has good points and bad points but I’m sure the more astute of you can guess what they are. Helpfully, Anita fleshes this out.

While Apple takes a top-down approach to app development — the company must approve every program that makes it into its App Store — Google will allow creators to upload any application to the Android Market without its review. Sure that means some duds will make it in…

Oh my god. When you see the crap that Apple has permitted into the store (never mind their in explicable removal of some applications which have some real utility or merit), then thinking that the App Store won’t be quickly filled with poorly audited, untested crap which will infest your phone is the wet dream of a naive would-be technology writer. This democratising approach will mean the Android Market will look more like Sourceforge than the App Store – filled with half-baked approaches to applications.

The big announcement is officially today. Won’t it be exciting?

Does anyone care about Android?

I got this video from “Mobile Web Wars Videos: Does Anybody Care About Android?“: A few things. Michael Arrington is funny. There seems to be a difference in opinion on what the mobile web represents to some. To Jason Devitt (CEO of Skydeck) it seems to be the ability to buy games (and presumably applications) … Continue reading “Does anyone care about Android?”

I got this video from Mobile Web Wars Videos: Does Anybody Care About Android?:

A few things.

  • Michael Arrington is funny.
  • There seems to be a difference in opinion on what the mobile web represents to some. To Jason Devitt (CEO of Skydeck) it seems to be the ability to buy games (and presumably applications) on mobile (using his $700M on games quote) but this doesn’t represent the mobile web to me. I’ve got to agree with Omar Hamoui that the mobile web really represents what can be done on the internet as a whole (and not just used to download applications).
  • People obviously feel very passionate about the subject to the point where they may ignore protocol if they feel their voice isn’t being heard.

AndroidGuys mix it up with GTalk web app

Oh for god’s sake. I wouldn’t have to write so much about the iPhone if people would stop being clueless about it. AndroidGuys have a rant about the web-client version of Google Talk that was released a couple of days ago. A few days ago, Google released the official Google Talk app for the iPhone … Continue reading “AndroidGuys mix it up with GTalk web app”

Oh for god’s sake.

I wouldn’t have to write so much about the iPhone if people would stop being clueless about it.

AndroidGuys have a rant about the web-client version of Google Talk that was released a couple of days ago.

A few days ago, Google released the official Google Talk app for the iPhone and it’s not exactly what you would expect. The problem I found with it was that in order to receive instant messages, the application needs to be open in your Safari browser. Otherwise, your status will be changed to “unavailable” when you head off to another browser window or app, only to have your Google Talk session restarted when you return.

They claim it’s a limitation of the iPhone SDK that the web browser page needs to be open on your device in order to start working. It’s actually more a limitation of being a web app – of running in the Safari sandbox. It can’t take advantage of the new Push service that Apple is releasing later this month for all iPhone users.

Why can’t people take into account that leaving a network application open completely bollocks your battery life. We can see this already with the difference between ‘standby’ and ‘talk time’. The difference is that IP network usage is considered talk-time and the iPhone does well in that regard with 5 hours of network access. For a device that might be with you all day, 5 hours ain’t a lot especially when all you’re doing is waiting for people to message you.

Seriously, who wants their chat program set up so that the only time you can talk with friends is if both people have the exact same websites up on their phones at the exact same time?

The same sort of idiot who thinks a web client of any sort is the best solution for a mobile device?

The rant finishes off with some pipe dreams about running an XMPP based service with built in Skype/GTalk VoIP which will undoubtedly get a zillion hours of battery life using just the charging provided by plugging your mobly into a lemon for an hour.



All the hype in the world isn’t going to turn Android into the jesusPhone just as a hack version of Android installed onto a Nokia N810 isn’t going to prove that it’s a workable product. Let’s see what Android will actually deliver when they deliver it. I guarantee I’ll buy one of them and see what the fuss is all about. By the time decent handsets are shipping, Apple should be about due for another iPhone revision.

We’ll also see if Google release a native version of GTalk complete with the Push service when the App Store comes online and the Push service is available. If they do, kudos due. If not, then it’s incredibly disingenuous of them. Do no evil. Sure. Easy to say when your money is based on advertising.

When marketing a new product

Telling everyone how good you are compared to a competitor is not a good way to start. This is why Venture Capitalists roll their eyes when people claim their new project is going to be “[FaceBook|Google|Office] but better!” The Samsung Instinct adverts are all about “Instinct versus iPhone”. This tells you two things: The Samsung … Continue reading “When marketing a new product”

Telling everyone how good you are compared to a competitor is not a good way to start.

This is why Venture Capitalists roll their eyes when people claim their new project is going to be “[FaceBook|Google|Office] but better!”

The Samsung Instinct adverts are all about “Instinct versus iPhone”. This tells you two things:

  1. The Samsung Instinct team are more worried about iPhone than any other phone. Even phones which already have 3G and GPS. That tells us they think other smartphones running Blackberry, Windows Mobile and Symbian are irrelevant. And did you notice the wait in this video while they wait for the Instinct to catch up with the Maps application on iPhone? That delay is going to be part of your day, every day, every minute you use that phone. There’s probably a reason why they don’t show the web browser launching in this Internet speed test video
  2. The Samsung Instinct team are not very clever. Apple has added these touted features. It’s great to have the technical superiority for a few weeks while you launch a new phone but seriously – iPhone has been out for a year and this is the best you can do? I am actually looking forward to seeing an Samsung Instinct in the ‘plastic’.

I jumped on this train because frankly, AndroidGuys jumped on it first. It’s not an Android phone but that doesn’t matter. Come on guys! What’s te point in telling us all about closed has-been platforms where the only thing innovative is the advert????

What else do you need to know about the Instinct?

  • It has a 2 GB MicroSD memory card included. You can upgrade this to 8 GB for more money and there’s only one memory slot so you have to juggle your media. I love doing that. (the iPhone starts at 8 GB built-in and goes to 16GB, all built in).
  • Screen resolution is 240×432 pixels. It’ll be great for the movies and TV you can get on it. (iPhone is 480×320. That’s a big difference.)
  • It has the same 2 Megapixel camera as the iPhone (which means you’ll need to carry another phone unless just snapping drunken pictures of mates.)
  • There is no information on the OS powering it or the availability of third party apps. (Even Bushmen of the Kalahari know about the iPhone and the App Store).

There you go. It beats the iPhone (June 2007) in the two areas that the iPhone (July 2008) will just fix. That’s fabulous. Well done to Samsung for pulling this out of a hat.

Apple really has gotten the mobile phone manufacturers in a tizzy. You have to laugh.

Android Fans think Android FTW! Obviously.

One of the AndroidGuys speculates on whether Apple rushed out the iPhone 3G in an attempt to pre-empt Android: “I’m going to make a prediction; Apple will find themselves in the unenviable position of fighting for market share. Yes, I know that everyone compares phones to the iPhone and its touch screen interface. A year … Continue reading “Android Fans think Android FTW! Obviously.”

One of the AndroidGuys speculates on whether Apple rushed out the iPhone 3G in an attempt to pre-empt Android:

“I’m going to make a prediction; Apple will find themselves in the unenviable position of fighting for market share. Yes, I know that everyone compares phones to the iPhone and its touch screen interface. A year from now, there will be touch versions of Android, Blackberry, and Windows Mobile. Apple will be handcuffed by the fact that they only offer one model and one aesthetic. Android and the other players will be available in many shapes and sizes.”

The rest of the discussion turns into the ‘things which are missing that Android phones will likely be built with’.

The article reads like the AndroidGuys are actually watching their chosen platform spin down the plughole.

It. Is. Not. About. The. Features. Dummy.

Apple has already been fighting for market share against SonyEricsson, Motorola (maybe not so hard a fight), Nokia, RIM, LG and every other maker of every other handset. If a phone does email and internet, then it’s competing. And Apple has the advantage of 6 million handsets out there currently and likely another 10 million by year end. I don’t think that’s an unlikely prediction. It’s now available in 70 countries, nearly everyone who had an iPhone will be getting a cheap upgrade (or free in my case).

AndroidGuys continue:

I hate to break it to the Apple fanboys, but there will be more powerful Android devices coming and likely in the same price point, if not lower.

Spoken like a true fanboi.

The problem with a platform that hasn’t released any hardware to the public is that hardware specifications will always be changing and every new innovation that comes from companies who actually innovate in this space is going to be copied for use in Android (or at least it will be added in a bullet point marketing exercise). So there’s a feature creep, a slide where the hardware gets improved more and more and expectations change constantly. Not all features will be supported by all phones.

What AndroidGuy misses is that Apple is very comfortable with being both the underdog and the 800lb gorilla in a market. They’re doing okay with that ‘Mac thing’ with only a 8% market share (or whatever it is these days) and they’re also doing fine with that ‘iPod thing’ which gives them a 72% market share in that market. What percentage of the phone market do you think Apple is aiming for?

And considering the recent price drops for the iPhone and the consideration that everyone and his cousin will be buying one, why would anyone buy an Android phone until there’s a considerable market for them? Case in point:

I’m getting a free iPhone 3G when the darned thing is released. My existing iPhone will be converted to Pay As You Go and probably given to a family member. Apple will have doubled their market share in my household and this is something that is being repeated multiple times in my circle of friends and colleagues. The exception being the people who are keeping their iPhones as development devices which is already a tiny percentage of the overall market (registered developers are in the hundreds of thousands as opposed to the millions of iPhone users out there).

When Android hits the market, it will be faced with Windows Mobile 7, RIM’s new Blackberry devices and Apple’s iPhone/iPod juggernaut. And maybe something new from Palm. Or not. Their developers will be fighting a marketing battle against all of these new innovative handsets and with very little to differentiate them (oh, it’s free? Yeah, big deal).

I do hope they love a challenge.