Irish Blog Awards ’09 – Nominated!
Related posts: Nominated for the Irish Blog Awards 2010 Irish Blog Awards ’09 Irish Blog Awards Irish Blog Award Nominations 2009
Just another WordPress site
Related posts: Nominated for the Irish Blog Awards 2010 Irish Blog Awards ’09 Irish Blog Awards Irish Blog Award Nominations 2009
Can’t help but grin. Andrew is a coffee expert, smart code-head and faithful sky-bully believer. “Those stupid atheist slogans on buses annoy me no end” Probably the same amount that I get annoyed by pithy posters in public view, religious education in public schools and slogans on the side of buses promising the meaning of … Continue reading “Humans FTW! Sky-Bully FTL!”
Can’t help but grin. Andrew is a coffee expert, smart code-head and faithful sky-bully believer.
“Those stupid atheist slogans on buses annoy me no end”
Probably the same amount that I get annoyed by pithy posters in public view, religious education in public schools and slogans on the side of buses promising the meaning of life through a short course and a fee.
Believing in the Sky Bully was something we needed when we were cavemen. When we feared the sky, when we feared storms, when we sacrificed wheat and lambs in order to ensure good weather.
And yes, it annoys me that the crash on the Hudson last week is being hailed as a ‘miracle‘ and not as solely the skill of a highly trained professional human being.
Humans FTW!
Bit of an older link but…Stephen Fry says: We should remind ourselves of the state of play before the arrival of the iPhone four and a half digital years ago in June 2007, (Fry’s Law of Digital Time states that 1 calendar year = 3 digital years). There were smartphones… I think we should submit … Continue reading “Fry’s Law of Digital Time”
Bit of an older link but…Stephen Fry says:
We should remind ourselves of the state of play before the arrival of the iPhone four and a half digital years ago in June 2007, (Fry’s Law of Digital Time states that 1 calendar year = 3 digital years). There were smartphones…
I think we should submit this to the ISO.
Yesterday I spent my day doing the ironing and dancing around the back room with the kids. Meggan spent the entire day with me and she was joined by our boys for brief periods. I ironed clothes and Meggan demanded the music – notably Katy Perry’s ‘I kissed a girl’ to dance to. Eventually she … Continue reading “those crazy kids”
Yesterday I spent my day doing the ironing and dancing around the back room with the kids.
Meggan spent the entire day with me and she was joined by our boys for brief periods. I ironed clothes and Meggan demanded the music – notably Katy Perry’s ‘I kissed a girl’ to dance to.
Eventually she got tired and the picture above shows what she did, unprompted, to ‘relax’ after her dancing exertions.
Chinwag have announced the list of companies they are taking on the Digital Mission to SXSWi in March (I say “taking” but you have to realise that the Digital Mission costs £500 in addition to your flights and accommodation so it’s not a funded trip by any means.). As far as I can tell, only … Continue reading “Infurious at SXSWi 2009”
Chinwag have announced the list of companies they are taking on the Digital Mission to SXSWi in March (I say “taking” but you have to realise that the Digital Mission costs £500 in addition to your flights and accommodation so it’s not a funded trip by any means.). As far as I can tell, only one Northern Ireland company is represented here.
They write:
Congratulations to the companies selected by the advisory board to attend the Digital Mission to SXSWi and listed amongst the 35 hottest digital SMEs in the UK.
It’s a shame that other companies were not included in the trade mission as we have some extremely compelling companies starting out here in the province.
As most will know, I got married in August and had a bit of a scare when the videographer seemed to disappear off the face of the earth and only got back to us two weeks before the wedding (after several months of emailing). Little did I know this was the start of the bother. … Continue reading “Worst Videographer in the World”
As most will know, I got married in August and had a bit of a scare when the videographer seemed to disappear off the face of the earth and only got back to us two weeks before the wedding (after several months of emailing).
Little did I know this was the start of the bother.
It took months for us to get even the first cut of the video post-wedding – and this was after a fairy story about having it posted to the wrong address (we checked the address he sent it to, they hadn’t received it). When we got the first cut, we were stunned to find the grainy picture, poor lighting and terrible sound. Now – I understand that a wedding is not going to be a studio but I would expect that we’d be able to, for example, hear the vows or most of the speeches or that the best mans speech wouldn’t be cut off just before one of the punchlines?
Next, the promise of two video cameras was not realised which meant that during the marriage vows, we can’t even see my face. Just one camera so we have a fetching view of the back of my head.
In all, the experience was less than negative – it was complete disaster. It’s taken us five months now and we’ve just given up and asked for the original footage because, to be honest, unless the footage itself is complete dross, my dog could do a better job of editing it. We sent an email requesting the tapes to be sent special delivery.
Your wedding day is meant to be the happiest day of your life and we were meant to receive:
Your day captured and presented in beautiful display cases with five copies to give out to friends and family.
- All the shots from your big day.
- 5 DVDs.
- Attractive display cases.
We paid extra for him to film the bride getting ready at the house but he was late so only got the bride leaving for the church.
This is what we got in the post.
So, I’d wholly recommend that everyone avoid Mark Gillespie as a videographer for your wedding. He’s slow, unreliable, belligerent and even though he was paid in advance, treated us like second class citizens. We were subject to his whims. A thorough lack of professionalism throughout his work.
He writes:
Whilst considering which Wedding Videography company to go for, you have not only to consider quality but budget and style. This is why we believe that our wedding dvd packages are, and shall remain, highly competitive and flexible enough to incorporate any ideas you may have for the day. Our process fully involves you, from the very start, in the layout of the final production – from visual effects to background music.
Absolute lies.
He continues:
We use two Sony HVR-Z1 Cameras. From Sony’s professional camcorder range the HVR-Z1 records stunning picture quality in standard DVD video format or in the latest high definition.
Again, more lies. He used one camera and there’s no way anything was recording in DVD quality, never mind high definition. The sound was apparently from Sennheiser microphones? Maybe if they were buried under the carpet?
It just goes to show that having a nice web site doesn’t guarantee quality especially when the web site says:
Today wedding videographers are a penny a dozen with every Joe and his camcorder taking up the challenge, for a fee of course. That is why you need not only know that the videographer is experienced and competent, but that they use the latest equipment to ensure that your production is of the utmost quality.
The man is a charlatan and an idiot.
Coverage of the FaceBook furor “Nearly 85,000 people have joined a Facebook group formed to protest against the networking site banning overly revealing breastfeeding photos from online profiles… …According to Facebook spokesman Barry Schnitt, photos of a fully exposed breast (defined by showing the nipple or areola) violate Facebook rules and may be removed. ‘We … Continue reading “BOOBS”
Coverage of the FaceBook furor
“Nearly 85,000 people have joined a Facebook group formed to protest against the networking site banning overly revealing breastfeeding photos from online profiles…
…According to Facebook spokesman Barry Schnitt, photos of a fully exposed breast (defined by showing the nipple or areola) violate Facebook rules and may be removed.
‘We take no action on the vast majority of breastfeeding photos because they follow the site’s terms of use,’ Mr Schnitt said, but added that some photos were removed to ensure the site remains safe for all users, including children.”
Safe for all users, including children?
FaceBook’s terms and conditions state:
Membership in the Service is void where prohibited. This Site is intended solely for users who are thirteen (13) years of age or older, and users of the Site under 18 who are currently in high school or college. Any registration by, use of or access to the Site by anyone under 13, or by anyone who is under 18 and not in high school or college, is unauthorized, unlicensed and in violation of these Terms of Use. By using the Service or the Site, you represent and warrant that you are 13 or older and in high school or college, or else that you are 18 or older, and that you agree to and to abide by all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
Are FaceBook seriously suggesting that 13 year olds are to be protected from seeing breasts? This rule was written by a man, isn’t it obvious? Someone who personally feels titillated by seeing a “nipple or areola” so they ban it. Isn’t this a little like homophobes who experience homosexual arousal (yes, there was a study).
Notting Hill even covered this nearly a decade ago:
Anna Scott: What is it about men and nudity? Particularly breasts? How can you be so interested in them?
William: Well…
Anna Scott: But, but, seriously: they’re just breasts. Every second person in the world has them.
William: Oh, more than that, when you think about it: you know, Meat Loaf has a very nice pair.
Anna Scott: [laughs] But they’re… they’re odd looking, they’re for milk, your mother has them, you’ve seen a thousand of them… What’s all the fuss about?
What is the fuss about? The more I think about it, the more I think our laws were put in place by the very deviants we’re trying to identify.
What is the etiquette around Twitter? pcnerd37 writes on the Global Geek Blog: “With the explosion in popularity that Twitter has received, especially with the massive usage at SXSW, it has become very clear that some facets of twitter are beginning to annoy people. For the benefit of all twitter users, I have made a … Continue reading “Twitiquette”
What is the etiquette around Twitter?
pcnerd37 writes on the Global Geek Blog:
“With the explosion in popularity that Twitter has received, especially with the massive usage at SXSW, it has become very clear that some facets of twitter are beginning to annoy people. For the benefit of all twitter users, I have made a list of rules for Twitter usage.”
A lot of these rules are pretty much the same as the netiquette so no big surprise there.
I’m wondering though about the etiquette specific to Twitter – like – if you get followed, is it necessary to rabbit out a “thanks” to each and every person? It really just ups reduces the signal:noise ratio even further. Bollocks to it I say. I don’t think it has any place in the conversation.
I’ve only unfollowed three people so far. These would be @guykawasaki, @jasoncalacanis and @scobleizer. Reason? Too much irrelevant signal. It’s not strictly noise when you’re talking about when it’s luminaries like these guys but at the same time, they’re hearing so much from their thousands of followers that there’s no conversation. And they update sufficiently frequently that Twitter just turns into their monologue. They put out signal, they only hear noise.
If you do get unfollowed and you’re informed about it by a tool like Qwitter, then please don’t waffle and beg and ask why. It’s just sad. Fix your signal.
Techwire does a short review of the Sony Ericsson Xperia X1 – another one of the “iPhone killers” that’s been trotted out over the last year or so. They give it a 3/5 score and will follow with a more detailed review on Sunday. Cons — Its Microsoft Windows doesn’t sit easily with the Sony … Continue reading “Sony Ericsson Xperia X1: not an iphone killer”
Techwire does a short review of the Sony Ericsson Xperia X1 – another one of the “iPhone killers” that’s been trotted out over the last year or so. They give it a 3/5 score and will follow with a more detailed review on Sunday.
Cons
— Its Microsoft Windows doesn’t sit easily with the Sony Ericsson software: it’s awkward to navigate, except when you’re in panels format
— The text, icons and external buttons are all tiny. You can re-set the on-screen items but they switch back sometimes. Too small to use without a stylus
— The three inch screen is too narrow to properly display videos and photos — they end up being the same size as on a bog-standard pre-pay mobile
To be honest, this list plus a few other things, was the primary reason why the HTC Touch Diamond (the iPhone-killer of last summer) lasted only a couple of hours in our house. Similar issues abound with the nice interface that sometimes breaks down and dumps you into WindowsMobile. And the finicky nature of the chicklet keys and tiny stylus-led interface means it’s a nightmare to navigate.
The iPhone will be 2 years old this January. And still no-one is doing it better?
Via Stut: Sir Ken Robinson makes an entertaining and profoundly moving case for creating an education system that nurtures (rather than undermines) creativity. Larry Lessig, the Nets most celebrated lawyer, cites John Philip Sousa, celestial copyrights and the “ASCAP cartel” in his argument for reviving our creative culture. Related posts: Take a couple of minutes … Continue reading “TED: reviving Creativity”
Via Stut:
Sir Ken Robinson makes an entertaining and profoundly moving case for creating an education system that nurtures (rather than undermines) creativity.
Larry Lessig, the Nets most celebrated lawyer, cites John Philip Sousa, celestial copyrights and the “ASCAP cartel” in his argument for reviving our creative culture.