Unravelling the Mystery of Good Customer Service

Obviously you’re aware that we recently received a sterling example of ‘bad customer service’. I’ve blogged about some of this before. You can’t please everyone Two sides to every truth Get mad at yourself for your mistakes If you run a business, you provide some sort of service to someone. It would be great if … Continue reading “Unravelling the Mystery of Good Customer Service”

Obviously you’re aware that we recently received a sterling example of ‘bad customer service’.

I’ve blogged about some of this before.

If you run a business, you provide some sort of service to someone. It would be great if every customer encounter was entirely positive but only a small fraction of people can lay claim to such a record. At some point you’re going to be part of a customer complaint and it seldom matters if it is your fault – what matters is how you deal with it.

e.g. During the reign of the iBook G3, there was a repeating issue with some iBook logic boards which caused some units to come in for multiple repairs. More than one customer complained that the issue must be due to our workmanship in providing the repair because it did not occur to them that they may be receiving faulty parts, parts which expire after a certain half-life much like the original board did. These issues were by and large the exception but it motivated one individual to go above and beyond in making sure everyone knew that we had failed to fix his iBook. This was patently untrue but how we dealt with it was in spending more time educating customers on the origin of parts and trying to be more aware when our name was used on the Internet in vain.

Now, the example above was not our fault – but we took as much responsibility as possible. Others out there will attest that my company spends a lot of time defending the rights of our customers when dealing with our favourite fruit company so that even when there have been supply issues (faulty parts, delayed parts), the customer is not the one who is most troubled by this. We do not get paid by anyone to spend any time defending the rights of customers to our suppliers because we do a lot of warranty work which is a set fee per repair. We do that stuff for free because it’s good customer service – we do it to benefit the customer and, yes, somehow get some repeat service (though we always say we aim never to see our customers again because it means their Mac has broken down again).

We aim to try and turn every bad experience into a good one – which is why I want to know when people have had bad experiences because unless I know about them – I can’t actually fix the problem! No-one wants to see someone unhappy surely – especially when they can fix it. And sometimes that may mean taking a hit – a hit you will survive, maybe even learn from, possibly even benefit from – rather than taking one later which knocks you out of the race. We may not have any decent competition in Northern Ireland but we have plenty across the UK (hundreds of AASPs) and we compete with them every single month.

This is why Mac-Sys is in the top 5 of Customer Service ratings of Apple Authorised Service Providers in the UK. Because we try hard.

The Real McCoy is a chip shop up in Four Winds. They have a sign saying “If you think we’re good, tell your friends. If you think we’re bad, tell us”. Similarly I worked contracts with a smart guy I really respect called Mark Case (he runs White Noise). He told my fledging company: “Treat us well and I’ll tell my friends. Treat us badly and I’ll tell everyone.”– and that’s the way it is in business. You have to look at the big picture and figure out what is best for the business in the long run.

One thing I’ve learned is that the weight of a single angry customer far exceeds the weight of ten happy customers or a thousand mildly pleasant but ultimately non-committal customers.

Choose your friends wisely, this ‘Shepherd’ certainly will.

POST EDITED DUE TO SETTLEMENT.

Education and Technology

Sophia Li writes for the Chronicle of Higher Education The most popular tools cited by professors were e-textbooks and online documents, with faculty members reporting far less enthusiasm for other electronic tools. Under a quarter of faculty members surveyed use wikis or blogs in their teaching, and only 31 percent of professors surveyed considered online … Continue reading “Education and Technology”

Sophia Li writes for the Chronicle of Higher Education

The most popular tools cited by professors were e-textbooks and online documents, with faculty members reporting far less enthusiasm for other electronic tools. Under a quarter of faculty members surveyed use wikis or blogs in their teaching, and only 31 percent of professors surveyed considered online collaboration tools “essential” to today’s classroom, compared with 72 percent of over 300 IT employees surveyed.

I’m probably going to say some things to annoy some educators so please understand I’m dealing in archtypes here.

I think this evidence supports my own hypothesis that ‘older-style’ educators prefer instructive methods where ‘progressive-style’ educators use collaborative methods. From my own talking to teachers and lecturers there are several gaps to be filled before a balance can be achieved.

The Technology Gap
Most educators are simply not familiar with technology. The transition to e-textbooks is easy enough but the adoption of wikis, forums and instant messaging is going to be a whole new world to learn. Whether you’re moving from markup to emoticons – it’s all new stuff to learn.

The Education Gap
Are the types of education entirely applicable for instructive or collaborative education? There’s a difference of proportions depending on whether the lesson is skills-based or theory-based. It’s not simply that ‘progressive’ collaborative-style education is better – it’s whether the questions have been asked about what can be done, what should be done and what the results may be.

The Personality Gap
My education was very instructive. I was lucky, however, to have some exceptionally good teachers* during my time at Rathmore. All of these teachers encouraged as well as educated and supported a explorative/collaborative educational approach. We didn’t have technology in any of these classes and maybe they would have been intimidated by it, maybe not. There was only one teacher, during my secondary education, who relied entirely on instructive education and who was obviously intimidated/frustrated by students simply asking questions.

The Confidence Gap
Some educators are simply not going to be confident enough to put together a wiki or forum where the possibility of anonymity might lead students to be outspoken, or worse, overfamiliar. Some of them like the position of respect I’m sure but there is a happy medium in carving out a presence online with personal-level communication with students.

I am not qualified to say whether any particular approach is better – but it’s worth exploring what is the appropriate response to technology in the classroom.

*these teachers were:
Sister Mary-Jo, Religious Education (pre-GCSE)
Miss Lowe, Domestic Science (pre-GCSE)
Mr Neeson, English Lit/Lang (GCSE)
Mrs Hilditch, Biology GCSE
Dr Rogan, Biology A-Level
Mrs Hunt, Chemistry A-Level

#oldme

Yesterday, Ian Sayers of Giant Associates posted a picture of himself aged 13. After the entire Internet had stopped laughing, he posted this tweet: and so, without further ado, I present some horrific photos from my misbegotten youth. So, don’t just sit there, scan an old photo and get it up on the web. Post … Continue reading “#oldme”

Yesterday, Ian Sayers of Giant Associates posted a picture of himself aged 13. After the entire Internet had stopped laughing, he posted this tweet:

Giant Associates: Northern Ireland Digital Media Training
Giant Associates: Northern Ireland Digital Media Training

and so, without further ado, I present some horrific photos from my misbegotten youth.

First Day at Big School, 1983
First Day at Big School, 1983

On the plane to Bulgaria for Skiiing, Christmas 1983
On the plane to Bulgaria for Skiiing, Christmas 1983

At Six Flags in Georgia in 1986 (aged 14)
At Six Flags in Georgia in 1986 (aged 14)

So, don’t just sit there, scan an old photo and get it up on the web. Post in the comments with the address or tweet at me!

Everyone should develop for Windows Phone 7. It’s easier.

Don’s Blog makes the point that coding for Windows Phone 7 is easier than iPhone. My thoughts on iPhone coding a master-detail set of two views on iPhone versus Windows Phone 7 and why the designer-developer story is better with the Microsoft toolset thanks to Expression Blend and the C# language.. This is just an … Continue reading “Everyone should develop for Windows Phone 7. It’s easier.”

Don’s Blog makes the point that coding for Windows Phone 7 is easier than iPhone.

My thoughts on iPhone coding a master-detail set of two views on iPhone versus Windows Phone 7 and why the designer-developer story is better with the Microsoft toolset thanks to Expression Blend and the C# language.. This is just an opinion piece, but realize I am not a newbie at either platform.

When I see even governments paying excessive amounts to iPhone development houses I wonder if that’s the best use of the money, just because it’s popular.

Well, developing for the popular handset is a good use of the money because developing for Windows Phone 7 nomatter how good the tools are would be a complete waste of money due to the market penetration of the OS being precisely 0%. Or even 0.00%

And without users, what’s the point of developing at all?

Now, you can argue that there’s huge numbers of Symbian users out there but these guys ween’t buying apps before and they’re not going to start now.

It can be the easiest or the most difficult platform to develop for. But without users, why bother?

Nokia: the plan before 2012

Mikael Ricknäs of Infoworld has an opinion on what Nokia must do to remain relevant in mobile. Nokia was getting complacent and its first mistake was not taking the iPhone and Android seriously early on, says Nick Jones, a vice president at Gartner. … Two years later, the move to open source has proved to … Continue reading “Nokia: the plan before 2012”

Mikael Ricknäs of Infoworld has an opinion on what Nokia must do to remain relevant in mobile.

Nokia was getting complacent and its first mistake was not taking the iPhone and Android seriously early on, says Nick Jones, a vice president at Gartner.

Two years later, the move to open source has proved to be a miscalculation that is slowing down Symbian’s development.

To attract more developers Nokia will also have to fix its application store, Ovi Store. The launch of Ovi Store — criticized for having poor search capabilities, slow provisioning of new applications, and a cumbersome interface — will go down in history as one of Nokia’s biggest missteps.

And he’s right that they only have two years to get it right or they will have to be content with owning only the low end of the market.

Now…that’s not saying you can’t make a lot of money in the low end – and the developing countries may provide a lot of that profit as ‘mobile’ is more capable than ‘internet’ in many of these nations.

But will Nokia be happy with that, will they be happy with the position of being the company that was the mobile giant?

I don’t think so.

Apple needs to man-up if they’re going after Games

While we wait with bated breath for the release of Game Center which will undoubtedly hurt early AppStore pioneers in social gaming (like OpenFeint or Plus+), I believe that Apple needs to grow up a little more and provide a little more of a sense of ‘game‘ rather than ‘app‘. This morning I spent a … Continue reading “Apple needs to man-up if they’re going after Games”

While we wait with bated breath for the release of Game Center which will undoubtedly hurt early AppStore pioneers in social gaming (like OpenFeint or Plus+), I believe that Apple needs to grow up a little more and provide a little more of a sense of ‘game‘ rather than ‘app‘.

This morning I spent a little time trying to track down a clone of Gauntlet on the AppStore that might run on iPad or multiplayer across multiple iPhones. The only one which seemed to come close was “The Relic” by Chillingo which is coming up on a year late. There are other games out there like Dark Raider, Catacombs or Shadow Edge but I can’t tell which of these games are going to be truly multiplayer – at least not in the way I want.

I think Apple need to look at how they present information for games. This, for instance, is simply not enough:

Bad juju

and this is also pitiful:

Mirror's Edge

So we see the icon, the name, price, size, a vague-ish rating for the game content (which, if you remember the dawn of the AppStore, didn’t exist) and basic requirements for the hardware.

Compare this to Nintendo:

Nintendo
Nintendo2

and Sony do even better:
Sony

You can see if this is a multiplayer game on the device, multiplayer over the internet, the specifications, the rating, the size. And they do it in a consistent way across all their games. And the multiplayer icons are the first things I look for in games – considering how irritating it is to have a good game and it not be multiplayer (though some games like Super Mario Galaxy have such a stunted second player option, you have to wonder if it was worthwhile).

Come on Apple, sort it out.

Selling Thin Air.

OK, I have decided to sell the Air. Though my MacBook Air is a thing of beauty, my iPad, iMac and MacBook Pro are providing more than enough computing power. The unit still has 2 years AppleCare and an external Superdrive if you’re interested. Related posts: Powerbook Woes! AppleCare? You Betcha. Selling three bits of … Continue reading “Selling Thin Air.”

OK, I have decided to sell the Air.

Though my MacBook Air is a thing of beauty, my iPad, iMac and MacBook Pro are providing more than enough computing power.

The unit still has 2 years AppleCare and an external Superdrive if you’re interested.

Apple is not the dominant player in any market that matters

How significant is Apple to the mobile market? Mobile Review writes: Before the Digital Agenda anti-competitive investigations centred on companies with dominant market positions, this initiative would change that to companies with a significant market position e.g. Apple. It may result in Apple being forced to allow Flash on their iOS platform amongst other things … Continue reading “Apple is not the dominant player in any market that matters”

How significant is Apple to the mobile market?

Mobile Review writes:

Before the Digital Agenda anti-competitive investigations centred on companies with dominant market positions, this initiative would change that to companies with a significant market position e.g. Apple. It may result in Apple being forced to allow Flash on their iOS platform amongst other things like allowing 3rd party devices to sync with iTunes e.g. the way Palm tried to do with the Pre. Apple has built a closed eco-sysem for itself that delivers a first rate user experience in terms of interoperability, a situation not totally dissimilar to what Microsoft was trying to do with bundling its own products with its Windows OS, a move that ran foul of the EU’s competition commissioner.

As much as I would like to say that Apple is dominant in the smartphone market, it’s simply not true. Apple is behind Nokia, Samsung, RIM and others in their share of the overall mobile market – and they’re not even dominant in smart phones. Apple does, however, have significant mindshare – which isn’t the same thing. The comparison with Microsofts EU ruling regarding anticompetitive practises with their monopoly is unwarranted – Microsoft had a 95%+ market share at the time. Apple is not even out of single figures in their share of the mobile market.

Adobe has been crowing about being present on 97% of Internet devices and yet they’re bleating to the DoJ and the EU to allow them to increase this market share? It’s plain who has a dominant or significant market share here and who is trying to force their will upon the market.

What is it about Apple doing well which sends competitors into unreasoning panic? Why do we have Microsoft fumbling with Windows Phone 7 and then undermining their own efforts with the Microsoft KIN and then undoing all that work after selling just over 500 devices? Why do we have Adobe tripping over themselves to get Flash onto a couple of devices when they themselves lay claim to 97% of the content framework market? Why is Nokia stumbling with half-baked attempts like the N97 and their own hubris regarding signal/antenna issues when they should be working to make something truly great. Why is Google lying and rewriting history to suit their new paradigm where they are the only freedom option against Apples alleged iron grip of the market? You have to remember that in each of these respective markets it is these companies, not Apple, who is the dominant player. Apple is, in every case here, a distant minor player. So why are they so worried?

It’s plain to see that not only have these companies lost their cool but they’re also out of ideas. Apple is a niche player. Their own dominance, in digital downloaded music, is what they consider to be a break-even business. It enabled the rise of the iPod but in itself it doesn’t make a huge benefit to Apple’s bottom line. When companies have to lie, cheat, plead with the authorities – then you have to acknowledge that something is rotten.

And it is blindness that motivates them. Microsoft has a successful OS launch with Windows 7 and some neat new innovations with Windows Phone 7. Notable because they haven’t copied the iPhone. So why are they pissing about with Courier and KIN and all the rest? Why squander that advantage? And what the fuck is Ray Ozzie doing?

Adobe used to be a great company with great product. Now all I see is posturing about Flash on iPhone. Flash, a recently acquired technology, is being pursued at the expense of their own self-regard. Give it up, make Photoshop, Acrobat, Illustrator even more kick-ass! (and make them as good on the Mac as you do for the PC and see if Apples attitude softens) Stop making me roll my eyes at every douche move you make.

Nokia. Stop fucking about. The last good phone you brought out was the N95. Move the fuck on. Stop whining. Stop over promising and under delivering. And stop wasting effort on Symbian. No-one likes working with it. And anyone who says they do just doesn’t want to lose a dominant position on a dying platform. They’re stupid and you need to ditch them.

Google should know better that the Internet stores truth better than any other medium before it. We know you didn’t buy Droid to save us from Apple. We know your OS is a ‘little bit open’ but getting access to it requires signing away your first born. Stick to what you’re good at. You’re a shit liar.

These mega-corporations will gut themselves rather than see Apple win – even when Apple isn’t trying to win. They’re being distracted from making good products. They’re declaring Apple to be a winner when it ain’t true and they’re suffering because of it. And it needs to stop.

iOS Development Resources by ManiacDev

Just some links to remind myself. ManiacDev has a host of iOS development resources from tutorials on how to make glossy buttons to comparisons of open source and commercial game engines. iPad Development Tutorials iPhone Game Development Resources Related posts: So, I want to start a games company… Putting some meat on the bones A … Continue reading “iOS Development Resources by ManiacDev”

Just some links to remind myself.

ManiacDev has a host of iOS development resources from tutorials on how to make glossy buttons to comparisons of open source and commercial game engines.

Wells-Fargo, SAP…on the iPad

Rachael King writes at Businessweek: Wells Fargo spent two years studying the iPhone before letting bankers use the device at work. Apple’s iPad, released in April, took just weeks to get cleared. This time around, safeguards against security breaches are stronger from the start, according to Megan Minich, a senior vice-president at the San Francisco-based … Continue reading “Wells-Fargo, SAP…on the iPad”

Rachael King writes at Businessweek:

Wells Fargo spent two years studying the iPhone before letting bankers use the device at work. Apple’s iPad, released in April, took just weeks to get cleared.

This time around, safeguards against security breaches are stronger from the start, according to Megan Minich, a senior vice-president at the San Francisco-based bank. Her colleagues used two of the first shipment of 15 iPads to demonstrate financial products at an investor conference in May. More are on the way, Minich says. “We’ve got a bunch ordered that we can’t get yet,” she says in an interview.

While banks may not be the flavour of the month with right-minded individuals in the western world, the adoption of modern technology is welcome. Many of the websites at the bank where I worked would only function with Internet Explorer 6 and there wasn’t much movement to update them to modern, secure browsers.

Apple has a real opportunity here to gain even more mindshare. And it starts to prove a point that I believe is crucial to the adoption of platforms in the modern world. The platforms will be pushed by the users not dictated by IT experts.

The same goes for Rob Enslin, North America president at SAP, the world’s largest maker of business-management software. Enslin says that when he travels, the only device he carries besides a Research In Motion BlackBerry is the iPad. “It’s allowed me to almost run a paperless office,” says Enslin, who uses it to access business applications, briefing documents, customer information, and other data.

This is the sort of soundbite which Apple loves – one that could only be improved on by the executive gushing about videoconferencing with FaceTime. I’ve been using the iPad as a main machine for a few weeks now and while there are times I enjoy a keyboard and a massive screen with multiple visible apps, I can cope well with the iPad as is. I still believe that some of the insanely great software for the iPad is still to be developed but these reports from Wells-Fargo and SAP show that the software may exist – but it may not exist on the AppStore if they can secure enterprise app distribution with their customers. And why not.

Some companies may also be reluctant to entrust their data to the iPad after a breach on the AT&T website revealed the e-mail addresses of as many as 114,000 iPad users.

This sentence ruins a nice piece. A breach on the AT&T web site has nothing to do with the security of the iPad itself. I have asked the author to amend this because, frankly, it’s nonsense.